Comments on: NCAA 10 Top 25 – Overrated and Underrated Teams

By: jordan

jordan — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 12:16:04 +0000

ok your talking about underated?
Alabama look they had one of the best seasons in 2008 12-2 lost to florida and then utah because they had 2 bye weeks but still look at them this year number 2 should ea give them better?

By: Brian You're Joking Right

Brian You're Joking Right — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 05:09:03 +0000

Oregon? You cannot be serious. I do not care if they are returning 11-11. Hell they could return Joey Harrington. It does not matter how many you return if you’re a mediocre team. And the reason that top 25 rankings do not match up with a team’s abilities is because top 25 rankings are simply trying to guess the final record of the teams. The truth is that no top 25 team would be selected from the PAC 10 (excluding USC) if this were not the case. Rankings are simply guessing that teams from the PAC10 will finish with good records at the end of the year because their conference is also filled with inept losers.

By: Drew Miles

Drew Miles — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 19:29:22 +0000

Kreebs, we considered Iowa (especially since we are Iowa fans here at GameRosters), but what stopped us from including them is the rough road schedule. Road games @ISU, Penn State, Michigan State, Wisconsin and Ohio State make up a brutal road schedule this year.

Like you said though, the defense should be great, Bulaga is a future 1st-round pick, and the running game has plenty of talent. But Stanzi will have to prove he can take on more of the load this year without Greene.

By: jdub

jdub — Mon, 03 Aug 2009 05:13:09 +0000

on NCAA 10 Rutgers is a very underrated team fast running QB, and fast Rb, also a decent defense but not great, o-line is also decent, but also not great.

By: Punchy

Punchy — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:12:14 +0000

Why doesn’t EA match the top 25 to their abilities? A team in the top 25 on this game may or may not be good in relation to the other teams. It really doesn’t make sense.

By: Jack

Jack — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:46:06 +0000

Auburn’s going to suck, Chizik is 5 and 19 as a head coach. Terrible choice.

By: Chicken

Chicken — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:27:27 +0000

Where the crap is Auburn? yall know they are the best and always will be.

By: Brian

Brian — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:36:46 +0000

Oregon is going to be so much better than people think this year. Yeah the stats show that they only have 5-5 returning on O and D but the real fact is they have 10 offensive guys who HAVE started and 8 on defense who HAVE started at times. That’s how these guys come up with rankings. If they’d see that, Oregon would be considered a top 4 team…which truly, they already are. I really think Oregon could go all the way this year.

By: 2009 College Football Top 5 Non-Conference Games | NCAA Football 10 News

2009 College Football Top 5 Non-Conference Games | NCAA Football 10 News — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:20:05 +0000

[...] week we gave you our Top 5 Overrated and Underrated teams based on the pre-season top 25 rankings on NCAA 10. This week we have another top 5: the 5 best [...]

By: Kreebs

Kreebs — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 23:08:18 +0000

Iowa is very underated. We lost 4 offensive and 3 defensive players from last years top 25 finish. Even though we lost Shonne Greene, we have plenty of replacements with Jewel Hampton (as long as he’s not injured), Jeff Brinson, and Brandon Wegher. We have one of the best if not the best linebacker trio. We have one of the best secondary. Our only question is our defensive tackles. Our offensive lines is the best in the nation led by one of the best if not the best tackles in football Bryan Bulaga.